Theory |
Purpose |
Application to Assignment 3/Professional Experience |
CLEM Model |
Help understand how to learn about a new ICT and how to use it to enhance student learning. |
If there are any new ICTs you need to use it might help your explorations.
Hence might be useful as a part of the planning process for Part B. |
TPACK Framework |
This is the knowledge that a teacher needs to effectively teach with technology: Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge. These are all used in an integrated manner.
Complex interplay of three primary forms of knowledge: Content (CK), Pedagogy (PK), and Technology (TK). |
It can help identify areas that need improvement, gaps in knowledge of how to teach using ICTs and how to use the ICTs. |
Backward Design |
Design unit of work using 3 steps:
- Desired results
- Determine acceptable evidence
- Plan learning experiences and instruction.
Because we can’t know how to teach until we know what we are teaching. |
By using the Backward Design model it helps to effectively plan the assessment and learning experiences according to the curriculum outcomes. |
SAMR Model |
Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition Model offers a method of seeing how computer technology might impact teaching and learning.
It also shows a progression that adopters of educational technology often follow as they progress through teaching and learning with technology. |
S: iBooks can be used in reading small groups
A: Read to me function on iBooks is used
M: Video recall function on iPad used to record reading
R: Use iBook author function to create own text. |
TIP Model |
Gives teachers a general approach to addressing challenges involved in integrating technology into teaching.
A backward design model and reflection process for technology integration.
The TIP Model provides a helpful guide on procedures and issues to address. |
Planning with technology – check its suitability to the objectives and learning experiences. Reflect on effectiveness of ICT and what could be improved for next time. |
5 E’s |
Framework for inquiry learning. Used often in Science and History.
Students build on current level of understandings to construct new meaning. |
Used to justify the various domains of learning and higher order thinking questions asked. |
WALT
And
WILF |
We Are Learning To (states learning objectives)
What I’m Looking For (What students will be able to do) |
Ensures learning objectives are clear and explicit for the teacher and students |
Connectivism |
Connectivism regards knowledge as being distributed throughout a network of nodes, which is anything that can be linked. In this case, nodes refer to the knowledge that is attained. Learning can then be considered as developing a map. As the initial map is developed, new pathways will be constructed, allowing the knowledge to travel throughout the network. This in turn allows the learner to easier retrieve knowledge using these pathways. |
With limited ICT resources in my prac classroom, majority of the teaching is hands-on, repetitive work rather than the more disconnected digital work which is associated with higher levels of understanding. |
Bloom’s Taxonomy |
Design learning experiences to include different levels of cognition. Ensure higher order thinking activities are included. |
The key is to incorporate/embed the terminology of verbs into questioning throughout each lesson. |
Postman’s 5 Things |
- Culture always pays a price for technology. g. cars and pollution (and many other less obvious examples).
- There are always winners and losers in a technological change.
- Every technology embodies a philosophy, an epistemological, political or social prejudice. The printing press de-values the oral tradition.
- Technological change is not additive, it is ecological. The invention of the printing press in Europe, did not create “old Europe + the printing press”. It created a new and different Europe.
- Technology becomes mythic, it becomes seen as part of the natural order of things.
|
Might be useful in reflecting on the way technology is a part of student’s lives or how a technology may advantage/ disadvantage some students. |
Toolbelt
Theory/
TEST
Framework |
It’s a way of evaluating and choosing technology considering the Task, Environment, Skills and Tools.
TEST Framework:
Task: what needs to be done? Break it into parts.
Environment: Where? What constraints? Standard method of task completion? Who is it being done for?
Skills: Strengths? Weaknesses? Tools already have? Ability to acquire new skills?
Tools: What tool bridges the gap between current abilities and to complete task? If tool not in toolbox, how do we get the tool? If best tool not available, what’s the backup tool? |
This will be useful for students in my prac class during the introduction of new concepts and skills.
Useful in considering appropriateness of a certain technology. |
PKM |
Taking control of our learning. How you gather and sort your resources/knowledge to make sense of things. |
During this professional experience, I will develop a PKM that includes: my mentor, other teachers, school staff, other pre-service teachers, other Bach Ed students. |